<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Janet Jackson Is Still Relevant?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://flisted.com/11930/janet-jackson-is-still-relevant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://flisted.com/11930/janet-jackson-is-still-relevant/</link>
	<description>Hot Celebrity Snatch</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 21:54:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Harry</title>
		<link>http://flisted.com/11930/janet-jackson-is-still-relevant/#comment-12264</link>
		<dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 08:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flisted.com/11930/janet-jackson-is-still-relevant/#comment-12264</guid>
		<description>Janet and Michael sucks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Janet and Michael sucks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pleeze</title>
		<link>http://flisted.com/11930/janet-jackson-is-still-relevant/#comment-12263</link>
		<dc:creator>pleeze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 16:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flisted.com/11930/janet-jackson-is-still-relevant/#comment-12263</guid>
		<description>IF JANET IS OLD TELL THAT SHIT TO SOCIAL SECURITY SO I CAN COLLECT WHEN I GET 40</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IF JANET IS OLD TELL THAT SHIT TO SOCIAL SECURITY SO I CAN COLLECT WHEN I GET 40</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pleeze</title>
		<link>http://flisted.com/11930/janet-jackson-is-still-relevant/#comment-12262</link>
		<dc:creator>pleeze</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 16:29:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flisted.com/11930/janet-jackson-is-still-relevant/#comment-12262</guid>
		<description>IS THIS BLOGG STILL RELEVANT??? I SAY NO???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>IS THIS BLOGG STILL RELEVANT??? I SAY NO???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D. Bleu-Internet Radio's GENIUS!!!</title>
		<link>http://flisted.com/11930/janet-jackson-is-still-relevant/#comment-12261</link>
		<dc:creator>D. Bleu-Internet Radio's GENIUS!!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 12:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flisted.com/11930/janet-jackson-is-still-relevant/#comment-12261</guid>
		<description>Wow...



First off, EVERYONE is a little TOO hype...  Yes.  Janet IS still relevant and will always be.  She was the one to ORIGINATE this sound of Pop music that Britney and Beyonce have been IMITATING from the beginning of their careers.  Her ENTIRE family revolutionized pop music and her brother STILL inspires dancers and singers to this day!!!



That being said, she IS old.  So you can&#039;t be surprised that YOUNGER people who have no connection to Rhythm Nation or Control to understand that their favorite artist was INSPIRED by those albums...



And as for what Americans like???  I&#039;m an American musician and internet radio show host who LOVES GOOD MUSIC!!!  People, we are all entitled to our opinions and our tastes, but let&#039;s understand that generic Pop (the kind where Auto-Tune, look it up, is used in EVERY song) is NOT artistic music.  It&#039;s solely for the purpose of dancing, not feeling.  Learn the difference people...  Janet has even admitted she&#039;s a &quot;performer&quot; not a &quot;singer.&quot;  The difference is that a Singer can actually sing but may not be a great dancer...  A performer performs but may not be a great singer...



that&#039;s my 2 cents!!!  check my show @ www.blogtalkradio.com/wwtf for more crazy opinions and MUCHO MUCHO MAS!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8230;</p>
<p>First off, EVERYONE is a little TOO hype&#8230;  Yes.  Janet IS still relevant and will always be.  She was the one to ORIGINATE this sound of Pop music that Britney and Beyonce have been IMITATING from the beginning of their careers.  Her ENTIRE family revolutionized pop music and her brother STILL inspires dancers and singers to this day!!!</p>
<p>That being said, she IS old.  So you can&#8217;t be surprised that YOUNGER people who have no connection to Rhythm Nation or Control to understand that their favorite artist was INSPIRED by those albums&#8230;</p>
<p>And as for what Americans like???  I&#8217;m an American musician and internet radio show host who LOVES GOOD MUSIC!!!  People, we are all entitled to our opinions and our tastes, but let&#8217;s understand that generic Pop (the kind where Auto-Tune, look it up, is used in EVERY song) is NOT artistic music.  It&#8217;s solely for the purpose of dancing, not feeling.  Learn the difference people&#8230;  Janet has even admitted she&#8217;s a &#8220;performer&#8221; not a &#8220;singer.&#8221;  The difference is that a Singer can actually sing but may not be a great dancer&#8230;  A performer performs but may not be a great singer&#8230;</p>
<p>that&#8217;s my 2 cents!!!  check my show @ <a href="http://www.blogtalkradio.com/wwtf" rel="nofollow">http://www.blogtalkradio.com/wwtf</a> for more crazy opinions and MUCHO MUCHO MAS!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terrycurl</title>
		<link>http://flisted.com/11930/janet-jackson-is-still-relevant/#comment-12260</link>
		<dc:creator>Terrycurl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 11:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flisted.com/11930/janet-jackson-is-still-relevant/#comment-12260</guid>
		<description>LOL, even the bastards who claim their not thinking about JANET...are thinking about JANET! I love it!  Keep thinking. Go Jane!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, even the bastards who claim their not thinking about JANET&#8230;are thinking about JANET! I love it!  Keep thinking. Go Jane!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blaquejoey</title>
		<link>http://flisted.com/11930/janet-jackson-is-still-relevant/#comment-12259</link>
		<dc:creator>blaquejoey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 10:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flisted.com/11930/janet-jackson-is-still-relevant/#comment-12259</guid>
		<description>@ Select and &quot;You are idiots&quot;...... The two of you are late..... First off, Janet is not making a come back.... she never left..... 2nd her album did acceptional for someone who did not use MTV for any pub.... she also made it to #2 on the BB charts.... The whole 1999 comment was tired, like you two.... I both of you should BIGHT,BLOW AND SUCK OFF!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Select and &#8220;You are idiots&#8221;&#8230;&#8230; The two of you are late&#8230;.. First off, Janet is not making a come back&#8230;. she never left&#8230;.. 2nd her album did acceptional for someone who did not use MTV for any pub&#8230;. she also made it to #2 on the BB charts&#8230;. The whole 1999 comment was tired, like you two&#8230;. I both of you should BIGHT,BLOW AND SUCK OFF!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SELECT</title>
		<link>http://flisted.com/11930/janet-jackson-is-still-relevant/#comment-12258</link>
		<dc:creator>SELECT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 09:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flisted.com/11930/janet-jackson-is-still-relevant/#comment-12258</guid>
		<description>a new day has come when ludacris beats your album out of that #1 spot. shes not that relevant. absolutely not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>a new day has come when ludacris beats your album out of that #1 spot. shes not that relevant. absolutely not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: you are idiots!</title>
		<link>http://flisted.com/11930/janet-jackson-is-still-relevant/#comment-12257</link>
		<dc:creator>you are idiots!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 08:18:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flisted.com/11930/janet-jackson-is-still-relevant/#comment-12257</guid>
		<description>YOU SERIOUSLY HAVE NO LIFE POSTING THE SAME THING OVER AND OVER AGAIN. SERIOUSLY NO ONE IS CHECKING FOR JANET...ITS NOT 1999....NO ONE GIVES A DAMN ABOUT HER &quot;COME-BACK&quot;......F*CKING IDIOT.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YOU SERIOUSLY HAVE NO LIFE POSTING THE SAME THING OVER AND OVER AGAIN. SERIOUSLY NO ONE IS CHECKING FOR JANET&#8230;ITS NOT 1999&#8230;.NO ONE GIVES A DAMN ABOUT HER &#8220;COME-BACK&#8221;&#8230;&#8230;F*CKING IDIOT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nene</title>
		<link>http://flisted.com/11930/janet-jackson-is-still-relevant/#comment-12256</link>
		<dc:creator>Nene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 03:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flisted.com/11930/janet-jackson-is-still-relevant/#comment-12256</guid>
		<description>Is Janet still relevant?  And what&#039;s the name of your blogsite again...?



My point exactly.



Sorry, but while Janet passes the test, you&#039;re tired site doesn&#039;t.



Have a nice day =)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is Janet still relevant?  And what&#8217;s the name of your blogsite again&#8230;?</p>
<p>My point exactly.</p>
<p>Sorry, but while Janet passes the test, you&#8217;re tired site doesn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Have a nice day =)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jj</title>
		<link>http://flisted.com/11930/janet-jackson-is-still-relevant/#comment-12255</link>
		<dc:creator>jj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:36:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.flisted.com/11930/janet-jackson-is-still-relevant/#comment-12255</guid>
		<description>how relevant is this website?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how relevant is this website?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
