Who the Fug is That? Best Birth Control– Ever
December 5th, 2007
By: Melysa
Daily Mail has posted these photographs showcasing stretch marks on the tummy of a famous supermodel and Hollywood MILF. Is this not the best birth control ever?
Seriously, I may be a female, but I have never been in a rush to have children… and this photo is one of the many reasons why. I’d consider a tummy tuck, but I’m too much of a coward to undergo an unnecessary surgical procedure.
Remember ladies, if you don’t want any baby-related stretch marks, take your pill… and there’s always adoption!
Find out whose tummy this is after the jump!
According to Daily Mail, this is supposed to be the tummy of supermodel Cindy Crawford while in Hawaii this week.
Personally, I’m not buying it. Photos were released last week of her in a bikini and she showed no signs of stretch marks.
This is 100 percent Photoshop Photoshop Photoshop!
Facebook
Adoption is not a birth control method… FYI
Photoshop!
That’s just one of the most vainest and selfist comments made…to think of the appearance of one’s stomach as reason not to have children. But I must appaud people who come to the realization that they should not reproduce…ARE ADOPT…with such selfish attitudes. God knows we don’t need more Susan Smith in the world!
Sorry to tell you those aren’t stretch marks, skin loses it’s elasticity as people age and sags. Even if you don’t have children it’s what most of us have to look forward to. What fun it will be in 20 or so years trying to guess what a tatoo was back in the day!
ummm….
even if you did give your kids up for adoption, you would STILL have stretch marks and loose skin.
and im pretty sure she cares more about her children than her stretch marks. your stretch marks cant give you love.
When the author was referring to adoption she meant in lieu of getting knocked up and stretching your belly out. Hence the no stretch marks? Jesus Christ!